 |
                      

|
 |
Want to know more? Ironworks
The individual Swedish ironworks were a community in themselves;
isolated, self-sufficient, and with a range of activities going on in
addition to iron production. There were many such works or communities
in Bergslagen, which managed and controlled the production of the vital
bar iron.
The areas in which the industrial works grew up were sparsely
populated. The idea behind the works communities was to operate on a large
scale at a time when roads, and travel in general, were few and far between.
So the works had to be totally self-sufficient. It had to have its own
farms, so that the workers could be supplied with food. Timber for building
had to be felled and processed, and forged iron for buildings, tools and
machinery had to be made on site. The workers were usually paid in kind
rather than in cash—most often in the form of foodstuffs. The conditions
were written into a contract. The smiths who worked in the forges had
a higher status than other workers, and also had various privileges bestowed
on them.
A steady supply of charcoal to the furnaces in the forges
was vital and enormous quantities were consumed. The estate owner (or
foundry proprietor) therefore made heavy demands on the independent landowners
outside the domain of the ironworks, and strived, using any means he could,
to gain control over the forests and the charcoal. The independent farmers
often found themselves forced to give up their freedom and become tenants
of the works. These tenants or crofters were allowed to continue to farm
and live on the land in return for providing the works community with
a specified annual quantity of charcoal. The charcoal was usually entered
into the books at a low price, whereas the market price of charcoal was
higher and could fluctuate widely from season to season.
The first ironworks communities of the 17th century constructed
and sited buildings as, when and where they were needed; no architectural
plans were drawn up. However, in the 18th century, the works estate tended
to follow the French system: the model estate would build a line of terraced
cottages, first and foremost for the most important group of workers—the
smiths or forge workers. These provided roomy and decent accommodation
(by the standards of the time), comprising one room and a kitchen. At
a respectable distance from the terraced cottages along the works' road
would be built a stylish manor house, with wings or annexes, in the parkland.
The various outbuildings would be grouped nearby and to the side of the
main house. Often, the manor house would be orientated such that the front
described a straight line to the local church. The estate would be well
kept and tidy—just the same as was expected of the workers, who
were required to show respect and propriety.
The forge works would be sited at a good distance from the
manor house to avoid the noise, dirt and smoke. When visiting a well-preserved
ironworks today, one is struck by how small the forge buildings are in
comparison with the works' road and the majestic manor house. A modern
steelworks, on the other hand, consists of a number of large workshops
or halls hundreds of metres in length. But it was those tiny forges in
the past that provided the base on which the prosperity of the entire
works' community was built.
|
 |

|
 |